
Photo: Alessandra Hartkopf for Strategies for Children
When she describes Massachusetts’ successful application for a federal Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge grant, Commissioner Sherri Killins of the Department of Early Education and Care often talks of identifying – and serving – all of the commonwealth’s young children with high needs.
Who, precisely, are high-needs children? The Massachusetts Early Learning Plan detailed in the state’s ELC application offers a definition that incorporates risk factors beyond a family’s low-income status. “Being low-income alone doesn’t make you high-needs,†Killins said recently.
First, some background. The goal of the Early Learning Challenge is “to better prepare more children with high needs for kindergarten because children from birth to age 5, including those from low-income families, need a strong foundation for success in school and beyond,†according to a news release from the U.S. Department of Education.
The Obama administration gave states flexibility to create their own definitions of high-needs children, within this general guideline: “Children with high needs means children from birth through kindergarten entry who are from low-income families or otherwise in need of special assistance and support, including children who have disabilities or developmental delays; who are English learners; who reside on ‘Indian lands’ as that term is defined by section 8013(6) of the ESEA; who are migrant, homeless, or in foster care; and other children as identified by the state.â€
The Massachusetts definition of high needs includes children with multiple risk factors:
- Children and parents with special needs
- Children whose home language is not English
- Families and children involved with multiple state agencies
- English language learners
- Recent immigrants
- Children whose parents are deployed and who do not live on a military base
- Low-income households
- Parents with less than a high school education
- Children who are homeless or move more than once a year
As many as 135,000 Massachusetts children, from birth to age 5, face one or more risk factors each day, the state estimates. Up to 20,000 children have three or more risk factors and, without intervention, are likely to suffer developmental delays, according to the Young Child Risk Calculator of the National Center for Children in Poverty.
A clear definition of high needs will give a more accurate picture of the commonwealth’s young children and help the state target services to ensure children’s health development and school readiness.
Excellent.
A recent story. My son a software engineer recently dropped his 6 month old off at daycare (mine). He saw a group of 2 year olds playing at the train table, cooperating, talking, focused and peaceful.
He has volunteered in a homeless shelter for high risk kids for years and often worried about their inability to play with toys or each other. Seeing the contrast shocked him. He commented that even 5 year olds were unable to do what he saw 2 year olds doing with ease.
My take away question was this. Why would we leave the tremendous work of caring for these high risk kids to kindly software engineers who have one evening a week on their hands?
Maybe this is a step in the right direction. Deciding who they are. Then we can begin to allocate the resources they need, and figure out those from which they will benefit.
Macky’s comment suggests an important and interesting way forward. Our plan calls for improving early education and care quality across the board and expanding access for high need kids to the highest quality settings. But we can also — with data — look carefully at what kinds of settings and services are best for kids with particular needs. Some children, such as newly arrived immigrants, infants and toddlers, and children who have developmental delays or have experienced trauma, may do best in family child care homes where the provider has some specialized training and ongoing supports. Others may do better with intensive home visiting, therapeutic center-based child care, Head Start and other comprehensive programs, or high quality center-based or public school-based programs. If we build the system thinking about high need kids first, we can tailor and learn.